The end of the line for Cursive?
Here are links to two great articles about the decline of cursive and the impact of this trend.
The Case for Cursive (New York Times)
The sinuous letters of the cursive alphabet, swirled on countless love letters, credit card slips and banners above elementary school chalk boards are going the way of the quill and inkwell. With computer keyboards and smartphones increasingly occupying young fingers, the gradual death of the fancier ABC’s is revealing some unforeseen challenges.
Might people who write only by printing — in block letters, or perhaps with a sloppy, squiggly signature — be more at risk for forgery? Is the development of a fine motor skill thwarted by an aversion to cursive handwriting? And what happens when young people who are not familiar with cursive have to read historical documents like the Constitution?
Click here to read the full article.
The End of the Line for Cursive? (ABC news)
Increasingly the argument that students should be spending more time learning keyboard skills than cursive — because that’s the future! — is beginning to look like a straw man.
“Of course it’s important to know how to typewrite,” says associate professor Anne Mangen at the University of Stavanger’s Reading Centre. “But handwriting seems, based on empirical evidence from neuroscience, to play a larger role in the visual recognition and learning of letters.
Click here to read full article.
Comments are closed.